Craig S Wright’s email to Dave Kleiman is provably false

In the infamous "leak" published by gizmodo and supposedly outing Craig Wright as Satoshi, there is an email that – if true – would be a real bomb.

it is dated march 12th 2008 and it reads:

I need your help editing a paper I am going to release later this year. I have been working on a new form of electronic money. Bit cash, Bitcoin…

You are always there for me Dave. I want you to be part of it all.

I cannot release it as me. GMX, Vistomail and Tor. I need your help and I need a version of me to make this work that is better than me.

Craig

( https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/knlyk7dpjqucpmiojhs8.png )

This mail wants to show that the early idea of bitcoin came from Wright to Kleiman, and not the other way around.

Needless to say, it is extremely suspect.

One thing I have found is that not only it is suspect, but it is provably false.

The domain information-defense.com from which this email supposedly originates (the sender is craig.wright@information-defense.com ) was only registered by Wright on jan 23rd 2009, when he registered the Australian company "Information Defense PTY".

BTW, this was just a couple weeks after the blockchain started, and this company is somehow the predecessor of the similarly named American company "W & K Info Defence Ltd" controlled by Kleiman and later passed back to Wright.

The fact is, I believe "Information Defense PTY" is indeed related to bitcoin mining, but I think it's pretty likely that Wright forged that email in order to establish a priority over Kleiman.

That domain wasn't his in march 2008.

Gizmodo explains the problem saying:

pointing to the likelihood that its registration lapsed and was later renewed, which would explain the discrepancy

( https://gizmodo.com/the-mystery-of-craig-wright-and-bitcoin-isnt-solved-yet-1747576675 )

but this just does not hold, in light of an historical whois search

On Aug 25, 2007 the registrant was a "John W#####ck, 26 New Lane S####n, NY 11784-3304 US" and expiry date was 15-Mar-2008. (edited to protect privacy of previous owner)

On may 27th, 2008 the domain was listed in a list of domains in pending-delete state: https://web.archive.org/web/20151226101620/http://www.expire.cc/2008/05/27

The domain probably expired, and on Jun 1, 2008 the domain owner was "eNom, Inc. on behalf of eNom, Inc. Customer TBD eNom Customer TBD eNom Customer (legal@enom.com)"

Enom is a registrar, who had a "back-ordering" service for expired domains" this appears to be an ownership used by Enom for "domain tasting" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_tasting )

Only on jan 23rd 2009 the domain was bought by Wright (presumably he got it from eNom) and shortly later archive.org shows a site for the first time: https://web.archive.org/web/20090216141126/http://information-defense.com:80/

So, I think that email is a provable forgery.

For the skepticals: the historical whois of the domain can be ordered for $ 49 from domaintools.com . I am not going to publish the report's PDF because its copyright status is unclear.

submitted by /u/fbonomi
[link] [comments]
Bitcoin – The Currency of the Internet

Craig S Wright's email to Dave Kleiman is provably false (reddit.com)

In the infamous “leak” published by gizmodo and supposedly outing Craig Wright as Satoshi, there is an email that – if true – would be a real bomb. it is dated march 12th 2008 and it reads: I need your help editing a paper I am going to release later this year. I have been working on a new form of electronic money. Bit cash, Bitcoin… You are always there for me Dave. I want you to be part of it all. I cannot release it as me. GMX, Vistomail and Tor. I need your help and I need a version…

Bitcoin

Israeli Regulator Investigating Public “Bitcoin” Company for False Claims (news.bitcoin.com)

Bitcoin mania has taken over the business world. Companies from India to Long Island are rushing to add bit, coin, crypto or blockchain to their names. As that is the case it would not be a big surprise if some have also stretched the definition of what they do too far just to have some connection to cryptocurrency. Now Israeli financial authorities have to decide how much hype is too much.  
Also Read:

Bitcoin

Don't be fooled by the false dilemma (reddit.com)

False Dilemma It appears there’s a false dilemma being promulgated lately — that the future of bitcoin will be either BIP148 or segwit2x. I just want to highlight that there are actually many options, the most likely of which is for Bitcoin to remain exactly as it is. Don’t be swayed by hype and FUD. And don’t succumb to impatience/anxiety. Segwit is great, and because it’s great it won’t disappear…

Bitcoin

False error notifcation (double spent) ‘code’ => -4, ‘message’

Now and than I seem to get a consistent false error notification.

Error message:

Request error: array ( ‘code’ => -4, ‘message’ => ‘Error: The transaction was rejected! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, such as if you used a copy of the wallet and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here.’, ).

After the notifcation the getbalance and getbalance ” ‘1’ are in conflict. Getbalance not showing the actual balance correct anymore. Despite the error the bitcoin transactions gets broadcasted correctly on to the network and within a couple of days (most of the time) the transactions get processed successfully.

Info on client

{   "version": 130000,   "protocolversion": 70014,   "walletversion": 130000,   "balance": 13.56365098,   "blocks": 455269,   "timeoffset": 0,   "connections": 8,   "proxy": "",   "difficulty": 440779902286.5892,   "testnet": false,   "keypoololdest": 1488349424,   "keypoolsize": 100,   "paytxfee": 0.00150000,   "relayfee": 0.00010000,   "errors": "" } 

Anyone here having the same problems lately?

Recent Questions – Bitcoin Stack Exchange

Speculation of a Major Bank’s Bitcoin Wallet Is False

Contrary to speculation and discussion from earlier today, Dutch banking giant ABN AMRO is not working on or releasing a bitcoin wallet to its customers as a part of its banking services. Social media was abuzz with speculation that a bitcoin wallet might be in the offing by ABN AMRO , a major European bank […]

The post Speculation of a Major Bank’s Bitcoin Wallet Is False appeared first on CCN: Financial Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency News.

News – CCN: Financial Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency News